Tuesday, July 30, 2013

What about MONEY ..when should we talk about it?

When is a good time to talk about Money? 

The sooner the better. 

Make it an easy thing to talk about. 

Make sure your kids are ok with it by starting early.
They react to how we do toward money. 

If you complain about it, they might not feel like they are worthy of it. Let them know its ok, be relaxed when you talk about it. 

I did not want to go to college because my father complained about the cost. I felt like I could not burden them further with that. 
I have a degree in Business now and several accomplishments.  

Make your children responsible by giving them ways to earn money 
Give them chores around the house they are responsible for. 
Treat it like a job and they will.  
Let them walk all over you and they will when they grow up try the same. 

When they are teenagers and want things 
This is a great time for lessons on money. This is when things get a little more challenging. They think they can fool us at times. 
Not making the bed right, hide the garbage rather than taking it out. Get the other sibling to do it etc. The main thing is to treat them with the respect you would want them to exemplify. 

When learning to drive
Oh the thrill of it. I would do anything to get to drive. This is a good time to use that to your advantage. 

The average first time drive will get in an accident within 2 miles of the home and withing the first 6 months of driving alone. 

When they get to 18 or college. 
 WOW what a change that is. 
Going away to college is awesome. 
It helps them grow up fast. If you can afford it great. If you cant try and encourage them and do what you can. Grants and other help is available  be there for them. This is a tough subject.

When you find the perfect partner. 

Now things get touchy so you might cower a little. 
But don't,,,, this is important. 

The last thing you want is to come home one day as a newly wed, to find a zero balance on your accounts, because the partner has a problem with money. 

Or feel like you can't buy anything on your own. Both are bad. Better to get that out in the open before you get seriously hitched. 

There are many other times to talk about money besides these. The next big one is when planning for retirement.

We didn't talk about this in the video but we will soon as another topic because this one has other dynamics to talk about. 

OK so now lets you and I talk about money: 

When you want more out of life. 
Not happy at work
Feel a calling to do something different 
When you have a DREAM that cant be denied. 

Thats when you must look at this video below. 

>>>>>>CLICK HERE TO VIEW<<<<<<

Do not get caught up in the hype. Know that results vary. 
Some make no money while other tear it up and make crazy money. 

If you are to take this on, you must prepare to work like never before. 

Not because it is hard but because it may seen hard to you. 

After all it is new. You did not learn to talk in a day. 
But once you did. It wasn't so bad. 

This is the same way. but it all start with a decision. 
Watch the whole thing and sign up now. 

How to make a million dollars, Ideas from the public ..Video

How to make a million dollars..Ideas from CNN public pole

Click below on link for video: 

In this How to Reach $1 Million special report, you'll see how following five cardinal rules of business management can pay off for you personally. You'll discover how a sensible, businesslike approach to your personal finances can speed up the time it takes to get you into the millionaires' club.

The Great Recession proved that conserving cash wisely not only helps a business survive difficult times, it can position a company to thrive once things turn up.

In 2008, for instance, Wal-Mart leaders knew they had to continue cutting prices to keep financially strapped customers coming in the door. To do so without hurting the bottom line, top brass suspended a stock buyback program and reduced spending on new supercenters, focusing instead on remodeling existing stores.

The payoff: Wal-Mart revenue kept growing during the financial crisis, and its market share has increased in basic goods, such as groceries.

You may not have the financial muscle that Wal-Mart does. But like any sound business, you know what your spending priorities are and where you have room to cut.

Control cash outflow

Create a life-cycle savings plan. Just as Wal-Mart execs contracted and expanded outlays to fit the company's business cycle, so should you.

Take your savings rate. Conventional wisdom suggests you should save a steady 10% or so a year for retirement throughout your career. Instead, says Maspeth, N.Y., financial planner Michael Terry, you're better off adjusting that rate to fit your financial situation -- pulling back to, maybe, 5%, when your kids are in college and the budget is tight, then ramping up to 10% to 15% after they graduate. Once your mortgage is paid off, Terry says, boost your rate again, say, to 25%.

Odds are good that you'll come out ahead with less pain.

Take a typical 50-year-old who earns $70,000 a year, saves at a steady 10% clip, and has $350,000 socked away in his 401(k) -- the target for that age. Assuming standard 2% raises and average annual returns of 5%, he'll amass $916,500 by 65. If instead he lowers his savings rate to 5% until his kids are out of college, bumps up to 15% at 55, and to 25% at 60, he'll have $980,000 by the time he retires.
Lower your operating costs. Another way corporate America improved its cash flow was by reducing its borrowing costs. While it's likely you've missed rock bottom on interest rates, they're still low by historical standards.
"If your debt is three years or older, take a hard look at refinancing before the window of opportunity closes," advises Learn Vest financial planner Tonya Oliver-Boston.
The savings can be substantial, particularly if you shorten the term of your loan. Say you refinance a 30-year $250,000 mortgage that you took out in 2007 when rates were about 6.35%, and roll the remaining debt into a new 15-year loan at 3.25%. You'd have roughly the same monthly nut, but you'd save nearly $160,000 in interest and retire the debt nine years sooner. That would free more cash for savings in the years before retirement.
You can apply the same strategy to other higher-rate debt. Say you're currently shelling out $500 a month to pay down $10,000 in credit card balances at an average 15% rate and $25,000 in college PLUS loans for parents at 7.9%. Refinance that debt with a home-equity line of credit, recently around 5%, and your payments will drop to about $275 a month. True, the rate on a HELOC is variable, but lifetime caps on increases should keep it well below PLUS loans and plastic.
Boost cash inflows
Price yourself right. A business knows how to price what it sells competitively. In your household, your salary is the equivalent of "your price" and nabbing a higher one is a sure path to greater profitability.
Developing a rep as a top performer is critical: Raises for high achievers are averaging 4.6% this year, vs. 2.6% for a typical employee, says Mercer. Make a strong case for yourself in your annual review by quantifying what you've done to boost revenue or cut costs, such as bringing in new clients or switching to lower-cost suppliers.
"Adding more value is about bottom-line impact," says New York City career coach Caroline Ceniza-Levine.
Coming to your boss with a counteroffer from a competitor can also lead to a bump in pay, but it's risky. A less threatening route, says Ceniza-Levine, is to reach out to recruiters to see what salary you could command. Then you can say to your boss, "Recruiters are coming to me with offers that are 20% above where I am, but I like it here. Is there anything we can do?" Framing the situation as a shared problem reinforces that you're still loyal.
Make a leap. "Often, the best way to get a salary jump is to move to another company," says Adam Weiss of Charles River Recruiting in New York City. Executive search firm Salveson Stetson Group has found that since 2010, execs jumping ship got a 16.6% pay hike.
That could be a mighty boost to millionaire status: Getting one such raise can bring in an extra $250,000 in lifetime earnings.
Get paid faster. If you work for yourself, cash flow is often a nagging problem: About 18% of businesses' receivables this spring were past due, reports Cortera, a commercial credit research firm. Many entrepreneurs end up tapping personal funds to cover the shortfall.
To avoid that trap, entice customers to pay you a flat monthly fee, instead of hiring you on a project basis, or require a 50% upfront deposit by discounting your normal rates, says Mark Faust, author of Growth or Bust!
Don't act like a shortsighted CEO by...
...demanding draconian cuts. When the going gets tough, CEOs who want to sound tough often impose across-the-board cuts. Yet be careful when trying to impose this tactic at home.
If you're looking to boost your cash flow through higher wages, for instance, cutting as much from your career development spending as from your vacation fund is counterproductive. Things like "continuing education and networking are worth the money." says financial planner David Blaylock.
More options on how to make a million dollars: 

NOW its time to change your money life;




>>>>>>CLICK HERE TO VIEW<<<<<<

Do you talk to your parents about money?


 Most don't talk at all 

“People don’t understand the basics about money,” says Vince Shorb, CEO of National Financial Educators Council. “In the U.S. it has to do with parents not talking about money, not bringing them into activities that involve money. At grocery stores you see children begging and throwing tantrums over wanting something and parents just cave instead of making it a teachable moment.”

“What we have lived through over the past several years with the economic meltdown and all of its ramifications is that we as a nation are woefully financially illiterate,” says Adam Levin, co-founder of Credit.com. “The only problem is that many of our parents will admit they never received financial training.”

“They are exposed to consumption of money 24-7 on TV, magazines, mobile devices and billboards, they are constantly being engaged to spend money, but they don’t know that they have to earn it as well,”

How to approach money discussions and lessons should depend on a child’s age and maturity level, but experts say the earlier the better.

“Every parent wants best for their kid, so teach them about money because it impacts their wellbeing, emotional health and overall health. It allows them to live out their dream and be successful, it’s the biggest important lesson parents can pass on to their kids,” says Shorb.
Here’s a look at what age parents and teachers should teach money topics to establish lifelong money skills:

Middle-School-Aged Children
Parents might be hesitant to share their paycheck with children, but Yang says pre-teen and teenage kids can accept the responsibility and learn how a paycheck is portioned out to cover the mortgage, utilities, groceries and other spending. “Make sure they know not to tell anyone the amount, but this will show them they need to start thinking seriously about budgeting expenses and will start getting thinking about career goals and desired lifestyle and how they can get there.”

Towell suggests showing this age group the value of compounding interest and what it can do to small amounts of money to encourage them to save more.

High-School-Aged Children
When children enter high school, experts suggest parents start cutting the purse strings and have kids pay for any discretionary expenses.

This age is also the time to start having real-life discussions. “Go over how to buy a car, what’s needed to rent a place, how to manage life and a job,” says Shorb. He also says now is the time for them to create a credit and budget plan that includes how much money they want to have in an account before opening a line, how much college savings they have and how much they plan to spend at school.

“Here’s the main problem: We have teenagers signing off on $20,000 student loans without being able to balance a checkbook,” says Shorb.

Read more: http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-finance/2013/05/06/why-parents-dont-talk-money-and-why-it-hurts-their-kids/#ixzz2aXtE2bYc

NOW its time to change your money life;





 The most remember the talk about money you got. money doesnt grow ion tree NO you cant Got to school get a job and save

The Future of Energy is here today. Bloom Box

The future of energy is here now.

1 The Bloom box will rock the world with  a sustainable energy solution never seen before. 

Google, Fed Ex, Walmart and other big players are using this energy today and it is working

This may be the biggest energy breakthrough sine the discovery of electricity.

Check this out. It is amazing 

NOW its time to change your life;





>>>>>>>>>CLICK HERE TO VIEW <<<<<<<

How to tackle your spouse's overspending

If one too many surprising holiday credit card charges has you sweating, it's time for a chat with your spouse.

Beware: As Deborah Price, author of The Heart of Money: A Couple's Guide to Creating True Financial Intimacy, puts it, "Money is an area where we're prone to being irrational, illogical, and overly emotional."

To broach the topic of overspending without initiating World War III, adopt this game plan.
Time it right. Choose a time when you're both relaxed, like a weekend morning, and make sure you each have at least half an hour free.
No accusations or hyperbole. Don't start sentences with "You did"; focus on "We." And while comments like "Are you trying to put us in the poorhouse?" may be emotionally satisfying in the moment, they're ineffective in the long run.
Don't use the B-word. "The word 'budget' has a negative connotation," says Price. Instead, come up with a "spending plan" -- a term more likely to resonate with a spendthrift.
Follow up. These chats work best if done on a regular basis. Schedule a monthly money date to stay on track.
1. Opening gambit: "I'm feeling a little stressed about money. Now that the holidays are over, I'm worried we may have spent too much. Can we talk about our financial plans?"
The strategy: Start by sharing how you're feeling, not what you think your spouse is doing wrong.
"When you do this, the reaction from your partner is more likely to be, 'Oh, I'm causing my partner to feel a certain way,' " says Price. "So he or she is naturally more inclined to say, 'I'm sorry,' rather than become defensive."
2. Take some of the heat: "I know that tennis club I joined set us back quite a bit."
The strategy: Accepting part of the responsibility can prevent your husband or wife from becoming too defensive to have a productive conversation.
If you can't cop to any overspending, think about how else you've contributed to the situation: Are you, say, too controlling about money? Unplanned purchases might be your partner's way of fighting back.
Notes Boston planner Lisa Peterson, who specializes in counseling couples: "Remember, there are things you do that your spouse is not always happy with either."
3. Meet defensiveness head-on: "I love you, and I didn't mean to make you angry. How can we talk about this without getting into trouble with each other?"
The strategy: Sometimes the subject of money itself is enough to raise hackles. Asking for the right way to discuss the issue helps defuse the tension, says Maggie Baker, a psychologist who focuses on money matters.
4. Keep it in context: "I ran the numbers. If we keep spending this way, it will take us another five years until we can afford the kind of house we want."
The strategy: "Putting the overspending in the context of the greater picture is more effective than being nitpicky," says Peterson. "When you bring the focus back to your joint values and goals, your partner will be more receptive."
5. Let your spouse take the wheel: "We got into a jam this time. How do you think we can avoid it in the future?"
The strategy: When you start talking about how to proceed, "Give control over to the person who is being criticized," says Baker. "Let your spouse think the solution is his or her idea." To top of page
Now it is time to change your life.
I quite my 6 figure job and I want to share with you how you can too.
Our members can access their leads and team data, and use Empower Network as a vehicle to build whatever business they want on the back end. Empower Network is the perfect affiliate marketing system to grow a network marketing or online business, fast, and will allow you to quickly and efficiently learn the skills you need, minus the fluff …and earn large 100% commissions to fund your lifestyle or business ventures.
Click  << HERE   to access the insider video that reveals the ‘commission loophole’ that deposits 100% commissions into your bank account daily, hourly …even by the minute.
You can thank me latter.

How to talk about money before saying I DO...

Our biggest Mistake was nto talking about MONEY

While many engaged couples are able to hash out which photographer to use at the ceremony and who to sit Aunt Edna next to at the reception, they can't seem to broach the topic of their finances -- a discussion that could make or break their marriage.

Money is the leading source of disagreement for couples, whether they're just hitched or have been married for decades, and in extreme cases, tensions about household finances can even lead to divorce.
To prevent that from happening, couples need to have a serious discussion about their finances long before they say "I do."
Everything should be put on the table, from current income and debts to attitudes towards money and how to approach financial goals like buying a house or saving for retirement, says Gail Cunningham, a longtime financial counselor and spokeswoman for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling. With many newlyweds entering marriage with piles of student loan or credit card debt, such financial honesty is especially important.
"Like it or not, we carry with us financial baggage, and that baggage is not always negative, but it's there," Cunningham said. "Even positive differences can lead to disagreement."
Yet while many newlyweds will pledge to be with each other "for richer" or "poorer," they often dread talking about money matters.
Nearly 70% of adults in a recent National Foundation for Credit Counseling survey said they had negative feelings about discussing money with a fiancé, while more than 20% said the discussion would either lead to a fight, reveal unknown financial issues or even cause them to break off the engagement.
Many people simply haven't learned how to talk about money with others, said Dr. Terri Orbuch, a social psychologist and author of "5 Simple Steps to Take Your Marriage from Good to Great."
The way people approach money is often heavily influenced by the way they were raised, she said. For instance, someone who had an allowance or opened a savings account at a young age may be more used to sticking to a budget. Someone who was given many gifts as a child may view spending money as a way to express love.
By identifying differences in the way they approach their finances, couples can set ground rules as they merge finances. A spender who marries a saver will need to learn how to stick to a monthly budget and embrace savings goals, for example. An impulse shopper will need to strike a balance with a partner who is more deliberate about big-ticket purchases.
"We're coming from different families and households and neighborhoods," Orbuch said. "We are bound to have different meanings for money and that leads to conflict unless we talk about it."
Here are more tips from the experts:
  • Stay calm. Don't ambush your partner with a money talk. Instead, find a low stress time when you can approach the topic.
  • Be honest. Hiding income or debt from your partner now will only cause larger problems down the road.
  • Get detailed. There are many ways to merge finances. Figure out a banking situation and budget that works for you both.
  • Talk about family. From loaning money to a sibling to caring for aging parents, you and your partner should be on the same page with how you will approach all types of situations.
  • Talk regularly. Don't just talk about finances when times are tough.
Now it is time to change your life.
I quite my 6 figure job and I want to share with you how you can too.
Our members can access their leads and team data, and use Empower Network as a vehicle to build whatever business they want on the back end. Empower Network is the perfect affiliate marketing system to grow a network marketing or online business, fast, and will allow you to quickly and efficiently learn the skills you need, minus the fluff …and earn large 100% commissions to fund your lifestyle or business ventures.





Home prices keep soaring

Home prices continued to gain steam in May according to a closely-watched reading, even as mortgage rates climbed.

The S&P/Case-Shiller home price index was up 12.2% compared to a year ago, slightly better than the 12.1% rise in April. It was the biggest year-over-year jump in prices since March 2006, near the peak of the housing bubble.

Prices in two cities - Dallas and Denver - hit record highs, topping even the peaks they reached during the housing bubble.

However, the national index, which measures prices in the 20 largest markets, is still 24.4% below the peak of June 2006.

Just a year ago, the index posted a 12-month decline in prices. Sellers had been struggling while their homes languished on the market for months, or even years. But prices have increased every month since June 2012, and each month the increase has been greater than the month before.

The gain in home prices has now made this a good time to sell a home. Many sellers are finding themselves in the midst of bidding wars, with buyers eager to make a purchase in a market with a tight supply of houses available for sale. House hunters are also eager to lock in a mortgage while rates are still low, at least by historic standards.

The record low mortgage rates of earlier this year have risen significantly, crimping the purchasing power of potential home buyers. But climbing rates have yet to slow the rapid increase in home prices.
Additionally, prices are being boosted by a sharp drop in foreclosures, which had been holding prices down.
Related: 5 things to know about rising mortgage rates

"Home prices continue to strengthen," says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. All 20 markets measured in the index have higher prices than they did in April. The housing market's recovery has been an important factor in the nation's overall economic improvement.

Many of the markets with the biggest year-over-year changes in prices are those that were hit hardest by housing's collapse. Prices in San Francisco, Las Vegas, Phoenix and Atlanta are all up more than 20% from a year ago. New York had the most modest rise with a 3.3% increase.
But the rapid price gains over the last year are at a level that no expert thinks can be sustained. Some have even suggested it was unhealthy for the market, raising the risk of a new housing bubble, at least in some regions. The rapid rise of housing prices in the middle of the decade eventually sparked the crisis in the financial markets and the Great Recession.

But Joseph LaVorgna, chief US economist for Deutsche Bank, said he believes prices still have room to increase further, even if their pace slows.
"Affordability remains near historic highs despite the recent rise in rates and home prices," he said. "And the increase in home prices should encourage banks to ease lending standards for mortgages, since the collateral for the underlying loan is appreciating in value." To top of page

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Awesome YOYO Show by Patrick Borgerding in Denver

While in Denver waiting in line to get into the Coors brewery right in front of us was this young man with a yo-yo and he was doing some tricks. Way beyond the norm. I asked who he was we had a great conversation and I asked of he would do a little for the video so I can put it on my Blog. 


He is something to see,
This is an awesome should go viral video. 

NOW its time to change your life;




Saturday, July 27, 2013

Obama requested a journalist be imprisoned for reporting US drone strike

Obama extends the long arm of injustice.

Yemeni Reporter Who Exposed U.S. Drone Strike Freed from Prison After Jailing at Obama’s Request.

Prominent Yemeni journalist Abdulelah Haider Shaye has been released from prison after being held for three years on terrorism-related charges at the request of President Obama. Shaye helped expose the U.S. cruise missile attack on the Yemeni village of al-Majalah that killed 41 people, including 14 women and 21 children in December 2009. Then-Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh announced his intention to pardon Shaye in 2011, but apparently changed his mind after a phone call from Obama. In a statement, the White House now says it is "concerned and disappointed" by Shaye’s release. "We should let that statement set in: The White House is saying that they are disappointed and concerned that a Yemeni journalist has been released from a Yemeni prison," says Jeremy Scahill, national security correspondent for The Nation, who covers Shaye’s case in "Dirty Wars," his new book and film by the same name. "This is a man who was put in prison because he had the audacity to expose a U.S. cruise missile attack that killed three dozen women and children." We’re also joined by Rooj Alwazir, a Yemeni-American activist who co-founded the Support Yemen media collective and campaigned for Shaye’s release.


This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.
AMY GOODMAN: A prominent Yemeni journalist who was imprisoned for three years at the apparent request of the Obama administration has been released in the Yemeni capital of Sana’a. Abdulelah Haider Shaye was sentenced in January 2011 to five years in jail on terrorism-related charges, following a trial that was condemned by many human rights and press freedom groups. Shaye’s release Tuesday reportedly comes in the form of a presidential pardon that requires him to remain in Sana’a for two years. This could prevent him from traveling to the sites of U.S. drone strikes in Yemen, a topic he has previously reported on. Shaye was first imprisoned in 2010 after he helped expose the United States’ role in a 2009 cruise missile attack on the Yemeni village of al-Majalah that killed 41 people, including 14 women and 21 children. The Yemeni government initially took credit for the strike, saying it had targeted an al-Qaeda training camp. But it was later revealed through WikiLeaks cables that it was in fact a U.S. attack.
Investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill reports extensively on this attack in his new book and film called Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield. He’ll join us in minute. But first, this is Abdulelah Haider Shaye speaking in 2010. He spoke to reporters from inside a caged cell in a Yemeni courtroom at his trial, saying he was arrested because he reported on the murders of children and women.
ABDULELAH HAIDER SHAYE: [translated] When they hid murderers of children and women in Abyan, when I revealed the locations and camps of nomads and civilians in Abyan, Shabwa and Arhab, when they were going to be hit by cruise missiles, it was on that day they decided to arrest me. You noticed in the court how they have turned all of my journalistic contributions and quotations to international reporters and channels into accusations. Yemen, this is a place where the young journalist becomes successful, he is considered with suspicion.
AMY GOODMAN: Within a month of Abdulelah Haider Shaye’s sentencing in 2011, then-Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh announced he was going to pardon the journalist. But Saleh apparently changed his mind after a phone call from President Obama. According to a White House read-out, Obama, quote, "expressed concern" over the release of Shaye. The journalist then remained locked up despite growing calls by human rights groups for his immediate release. Shaye’s lawyer, Abdulrahman Barman, described the impact of President Obama’s phone call.
ABDULRAHMAN BARMAN: [translated] Yes, there was a visit by some social figures and sheikhs to the president, and they negotiated his release and his pardon. We were all waiting in the office for the release memo, which was printed and prepared in a file for the president to sign. And he was to announce the pardon the next day. But the mediators were hasty to announce that pardon. That same day, President Obama called the Yemeni president to express U.S. concerns over the release of Abdulelah Haider.
AMY GOODMAN: That was Shaye’s attorney. He was talking to Jeremy Scahill. When we come back from break, we’ll be joined by investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill about the release of Abdulelah Haider Shaye. We’ll also be joined by a Yemeni activist. This is Democracy Now! We’ll be back in a minute.
AMY GOODMAN: We continue on the release of the Yemeni journalist Abdulelah Haider Shaye. Prior to his arrest, he broke a number of important stories about al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and he did the last known interview with U.S.-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki just before it was revealed he was on a CIA hit list. Shaye’s work often appeared on Al Jazeera. His investigative reporting was used by international journalists. This is his friend, the dissident political cartoonist Kamal Sharaf.
KAMAL SHARAF: [translated] He was so interested in revealing the truth, to reveal the American exploitation of al-Qaeda to occupy some Islamic countries culturally and economically. What is al-Qaeda? Who supports it? Why is it in a war with America? These questions were raised by all. All of us wanted to know what is going on. We were only exposed to Western media and Arab media funded by the West, which depicts only one image of al-Qaeda. We haven’t heard other viewpoints. But Abdulelah brought a different viewpoint.
AMY GOODMAN: On Wednesday, Amnesty International responded to Abdulelah Haider Shaye’s release by calling on the Yemeni and U.S. governments to investigate whether he was arbitrarily imprisoned based on his work as a journalist, as well as an independent review of the 2009 attack he helped expose.
For more, we’re joined by two people who have closely followed Shaye’s case. Investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill, who is the producer and writer of the new film, Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield, also author of the new book by the same title, he is the national security correspondent for The Nation magazine. We’re also joined in Washington, D.C., by Rooj Alwazir. She’s a Yemeni-American activist who co-founded the Support Yemen media collective based in Sana’a, Yemen. She helped campaign for Abdulelah Haider Shaye’s release and is currently working on a documentary on drone wars.
We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Rooj Alwazir, were you surprised by the news of Shaye’s release this week? And can you talk about its significance?
ROOJ ALWAZIR: Most definitely. We were expecting something to happen. President Hadi had come out in May, and he had a meeting with U.N. representatives and told them that he promises that Shaye will be coming out sometime before Ramadan, which is sometime before July. But speaking to many of the lawyers that had been working on the case, they’ve kind of—we’ve heard the rhetoric many, many times before, and President Hadi hasn’t really followed up on the timeline that he usually says. So, when we heard the news two days ago, it was a great surprise to many of us, and it was a great, exciting surprise.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, let’s talk about the White House’s response to the release of Shaye. Jeremy Scahill contacted the National Security Council for a response. This is what the National Security Council spokesperson, Bernadette Meehan wrote. She wrote, quote, "We are concerned and disappointed by the early release of Abd-Ilah-Shai, who was sentenced by a Yemeni court to five years in prison for his involvement with Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula." Jeremy Scahill, talk about what they have said.
JEREMY SCAHILL: First of all, we should—we should let that statement set in. The White House is saying that they are disappointed and concerned that a Yemeni journalist has been released from a Yemeni prison. The White House is citing his conviction, that he supposedly was a supporter of al-Qaeda, in a kangaroo court, a court that was condemned by every major international media freedom organization, every major international human rights organization, that it was a total sham trial, where he was kept in a cage during the course of his prosecution and was convicted on trumped-up charges. So, Mr. Constitutional Law Professor President is saying that this Yemeni court, that has been condemned by every international human rights organization in the world, is somehow legitimate.
Secondly, when I’ve asked the White House and the State Department for a shred of evidence that Abdulelah Haider Shaye was guilty of anything other than journalism, critical journalism, they won’t provide it. They just say what they often do: "State secrets. Trust us."
The fact is, Abdulelah Haider Shaye is a journalist who did very critical interviews with people like Anwar al-Awlaki. If you go back and you read his interviews with Awlaki, he’s challenging him on his praise of the underwear bomb attempt, saying, "But that was a plane full of civilians. How was that a legitimate target?" In fact, I would put forward that Abdulelah Haider Shaye asked more critical questions of figures within the al-Qaeda organization in Yemen than a single member of the "Caviar Correspondents Association" in the United States, those jokers who sit in the front row and pretend to play journalists on television.
This was a man who was put in prison because he had the audacity to expose a U.S. cruise missile attack that killed three dozen women and children. And the United States had tried to cover it up. They had the Yemeni government take responsibility for the strikes. The U.S. role was not initially owned. They said that they had blown up an al-Qaeda training camp. The reality was, women and children were killed. And why do we know that? We know it for two reasons. One is because Abdulelah Haider Shaye went to the scene, he took photographs of what were clearly U.S. cruise missile parts with "General Dynamics" on them, "Made in the United States" on them, and because of the WikiLeaks cables showing that General David Petraeus, who at the time was the CENTCOMcommander, conspired with the Yemeni dictator, Ali Abdullah Saleh, for the United States to begin bombing Yemen in the form of drones and cruise—drone strikes and cruise missile strikes and to have the Yemeni government publicly take responsibility for it. So when Abdulelah Haider Shaye exposed this and it became clear to the world that the Obama administration was starting to bomb Yemen, he was abducted by Yemen’s U.S.-backed political security forces. He was taken to a jail and beaten and told that if he continued to report on the U.S. bombing campaign in Yemen, that he would be put back in jail. He went straight from his beating onto the airwaves of Al Jazeera and said, "I was just abducted by Yemen security forces, and they threatened me." And then, some months later, his house was raided in a night raid, and he was snatched and disappeared for 30 days. He was then brought into a court that was set up specifically to prosecute journalists who had committed crimes against the U.S.-backed dictatorship and was sentenced to five years in that court.
So, my question for the White House would be: You want to co-sign a dictator’s arrest of a journalist, beating of a journalist, and conviction in a court that every human rights organization in the world has said was a sham court? That’s the side that the White House is on right now, not on the side of press freedom around the world. They’re on the side of locking up journalists who have the audacity to actually be journalists.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to a clip from your film, Jeremy, Dirty Wars, where you go to al-Majalah to speak with residents and survivors of the U.S. cruise missile attack in 2009.
MUQBAL AL-KAZEMI: [translated] People saw the smoke and felt the earth shake. They had never seen anything like it. I ran to the area. I found scattered bodies and injured women and children. Forty-six people were killed, including five pregnant women. If they kill innocent children and call them al-Qaeda, then we are all al-Qaeda. If children are terrorists, then we are all terrorists.
SURVIVOR MOTHER: [translated] At 6:00 a.m., they were sleeping, and I was making bread. When the missiles exploded, I lost consciousness. I didn’t know what happened to my children, my daughter, my husband. They all died. Only I survived, along with this old man and my daughter.
SURVIVOR DAUGHTER: [translated] Missiles attacked me and my brother Ibrahim and my mother. Their hands were cut.
JEREMY SCAHILL: The echoes of Gardez were everywhere, so many of the details repeating themselves. But there was one important difference: In Gardez, the American soldiers went to obscene lengths to cover up the killings; here in al-Majalah, despite the official denial, they had left their fingerprints strewn across the desert. Why would they deny something so obvious, when anyone who visited the bomb site would see the truth? But maybe that was the point. There was no declared war in Yemen. Out here, in the middle of the desert, no one was looking.
AMY GOODMAN: An excerpt from Jeremy Scahill’s Dirty Wars. Jeremy, you were at al-Majalah.
JEREMY SCAHILL: And, in fact, what I say right after that is that the one local journalist who had investigated the reporting—the bombing had disappeared.
You know, I mean, what I felt there when I was talking to those survivors is that the only Americans they will ever meet are cruise missiles, that took their—the lives of their family members. And, you know, being there with them and listening to this woman who had lost so many members of her family, and this tribal leader, Muqbal, who was there—he was spared from that attack only because he was running an errand that day, and he returned back to find his village completely blown up. And I talked to tribal leaders who went there within 24 hours of the strike, and they described a scene where livestock and humans—the flesh of livestock and humans was melted together, and they couldn’t determine if it was goats or sheep or human flesh, and they were trying to figure out how to even bury the dead. And, you know, we have video that’s extremely graphic of infants being pulled from rubble, you know, children. I mean, 21 children were killed in that attack, and 14 women. And they claimed it was an al-Qaeda strike, but then when the Yemeni Parliament went to investigate it, they determined that that was a total lie.
And why is it that the Obama administration has never had to publicly state why they killed 14 women and 21 children in the first strike that President Obama authorized? And, you know, cruise missiles are a devastating weapon, and cluster bombs, which are banned internationally—the United States is one of the only nations on earth that continues to use cluster bombs. These are like flying land mines that shred people into ground meat. That’s why the tribal leaders were saying, "We couldn’t tell if it was the flesh of goats or sheep or humans." I mean, I’ve seen in Yugoslavia and elsewhere the aftermath of cluster bombs, but to use these on a Bedouin village—I mean, this White House should have to explain why that strike was in the interest of U.S. national security.
AMY GOODMAN: You talked about the White House’s response now, that Shaye should have had to serve out his full term. Also talk about President Obama’s phone call to the dictator, Saleh.
JEREMY SCAHILL: Yeah, in—well, what happened is that—you know, so, Shaye is convicted in this kangaroo court, and then, in February of 2011, the Saba News Agency, the official Yemen news agency, did a report saying that Ali Abdullah Saleh, the dictator of Yemen, was going to pardon Abdulelah Haider Shaye. You have to understand, at the time, there were posters put up all throughout the Yemeni capital demanding his freedom. There was huge tribal pressure. The human rights organization HOOD, which was representing him—huge pressure. Rooj and other activists, other people in Yemen, there was massive pressure on that dictatorship to release him. Everyone knew it was a sham, and everyone in Yemen knows about the bombing of al-Majalah. It is—you see postcards with it at demonstrations, demanding accountability from the United States. And he’s the guy who exposed it, so people knew who he was.
So, Ali Abdullah Saleh is in a postion where it was becoming politically untenable to hold him in prison. He says he’s going to pardon him. The Yemeni news agency releases this. That day, he gets a phone call from the White House.
AMY GOODMAN: This is like a year ago.
JEREMY SCAHILL: This was in February of 2011. He gets a phone call from the White House, not from, you know, some undersecretary of who knows what, but from President Obama personally. And President Obama, according to the White House’s own read-out of that call, expresses concern about reports that they were going to release Abdulelah Haider Shaye. And just to give you a sense of what a client state Yemen was, the pardon then is ripped up, and he remained in prison then over the course of the next two years. And, in fact, the White House—President Hadi just left yesterday from Sana’a. He’s visiting the United States right now. Supposedly it was for medical reasons, but he’s now going to meet with President Obama. And I think it’s going to be very interesting to see what comes out of that. The White House is clearly very, very irked that Hadi released Abdulelah Haider Shaye.
AMY GOODMAN: I wanted to go to the lawyer for one minute, to Abdulelah Haider Shaye’s lawyer, Abdulrahman Barman, who describes how Shaye was beaten and psychologically tortured by Yemeni security forces.
ABDULRAHMAN BARMAN: [translated] Abdulelah Haider received many threats from the security forces over the phone. And when he was kidnapped for the first time, they beat him and interrogated him concerning his statements and the analysis on the al-Majalah issue and the U.S. war against terrorism here in Yemen.
I think he was arrested based on a request from the American government. At the time of his arrest, they beat him, even though he did not resist them. He was asked by soldiers to come, and he went with them. They took him from his house. And when they were in his yard, the soldiers beat him cruelly using the butts of their guns. And one of them bit him in the chest, and the scar was still there when we met him.
In prison, he was not physically tortured, but he was psychologically tortured. He was put in a dirty bathroom for five days. He was told that all of his friends and family members had left him, that he was alone, and that no one supported his case. He was tortured by false information.
In the first session of the prosecution, I noticed that one of Abdulelah’s teeth was extracted and that another one was broken, in addition to some scars on his chest. That was after 25 days of detention. There were a lot of scars on his chest. We have noted that in the general prosecution minutes, and we requested a referral to a forensic doctor to prove the torture on his body. He was referred, but we have not received a copy of the doctor’s report, and we have not been allowed to make a copy for his case file so far.
AMY GOODMAN: That was Shaye’s attorney, Abdulrahman Barman. Rooj Alwazir, you just spoke with Barman. Can you talk about the conditions of Shaye’s release this week?
ROOJ ALWAZIR: Sure. Right now his health is deteriorating. He lost a massive amount of weight. But he’s in a better position. He’s with his family. He finally enjoyed his first iftar with his family and his kids. He’s hopeful that justice will still prevail, because, as he said—as soon as he was released, he said in a statement to his lawyers, "Although I am released, I am still not a free man. In the eyes of the political and national security, I am still a threat, and therefore I am not free."
He has—he is under two years of house arrest and, after that, three years of a travel ban, not able to really—he still has no—he’s still not able to speak. He’s still not able to write. He’s not allowed to go anywhere without having security around him at all times. And this is all on the concept of him still—of him still being linked to al-Qaeda, with no evidence being supported or presented against him. So there’s still this idea that he is, you know, quote-unquote, "aiding the enemy" or part of al-Qaeda, with no evidence against him. So, although he’s part of—he’s out of jail, he still feels that he is imprisoned inside.
AMY GOODMAN: Finally, Jeremy—
AMY GOODMAN: Go ahead, Rooj.
ROOJ ALWAZIR: So I just think that’s really important. Although this is a big victory that he has been released, I think that’s something that we really need to be focusing on, that although—that he’s never been given a proper trial, that due process was completely skipped, that it was completely a political decision based on no—with no legal basis, only outside interference by the Obama administration.
AMY GOODMAN: Jeremy, put Shaye’s treatment in the context of how reporters are being dealt with today.
JEREMY SCAHILL: Yeah, I mean, look at this White House’s position on whistleblowers and on journalists. You had the seizure of the Associated Press phone records. You have record numbers of prosecutions and indictments under the Espionage Act. You have what I think amounts to a criminalization of independent reporting. This White House seems intent on having the only information that journalists have access to official leaks, when it is meant to make the White House look noble and saving the world for peace, freedom and democracy. And any independent reporting or talking to sources that are not official is frowned upon, and at times prosecuted.
There was a recent court decision that I think is very disturbing. James Risen of The New York Timeshas been ordered to testify against a source of his who was a whistleblower. You have Bradley Manning’s trial coming to conclusion. The charge against him of aiding the enemy boils down to an assertion that anyone who provides information on the Internet, that then can be read by a terrorist, is somehow aiding the enemy. They’re actually contending that Bradley Manning, in leaking the diplomatic cables, aided Osama bin Laden directly, because Osama bin Laden was reported to have read some of the WikiLeaks cables. If that charge sticks, it should be chilling not just for journalists, but for the public at large, in the day of social media, when everyone is a journalist of sorts.
So, this administration has been utterly shameful in its approach toward a free press, toward whistleblowers, and it fundamentally undermines the notion that we have a free press in a democratic society. The fact that they had a Yemeni journalist jailed in a Yemeni court and kept him in prison there and are now deeply concerned and upset that he’s been released speaks volumes about this administration’s attitude toward journalists.
AMY GOODMAN: Jeremy, before you go, I just wanted to ask you about a very significant Senate hearing that was held yesterday addressing the closing of Guantánamo Bay prison for the first time since 2009, when Obama made his first and failed concerted push to shutter the prison. One of those who testified was Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, which opposes closing Guantánamo. The topic of drones came up when he was questioned Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas.
SEN. TED CRUZ: It has been reported that president—under the Obama administration, approximately 395 people have been killed by drone strikes. Are you aware of any reasonable argument that it is somehow more protective of human rights, more protective of civil liberties, to fire a missile at someone from a drone and kill them than it would be to detain them and interrogate them, determine their guilt or innocence and determine what intelligence might be derived from that individual?
FRANK GAFFNEY: I’m probably not the best arbiter of what is humane. You have people on this panel who’ve spent a lot of their time dwelling on that. I kind of focus on national security. But just as a human being, I will tell you I think if you kill people, that typically is less humane than incarcerating them. Letting them—letting them starve to death is, in my judgment, less humane than feeding them involuntarily, if necessary.
AMY GOODMAN: That was Frank Gaffney, Center for Security Policy, testifying at the Guantánamo Bay prison hearing yesterday in the Senate. Jeremy Scahill?
JEREMY SCAHILL: I mean, these—you know, Frank Gaffney is a notorious, discredited neocon. The fact that he was even testifying, you know, talks about the seriousness of that hearing. But let’s be clear here: The Republicans, during their administration, their sort of reign of terror, were Murder Incorporated, where torture was the official policy. They didn’t even—they didn’t pretend to act like it was some abomination that happened once in a while. They were killing people in massive numbers in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, all around the world. So the fact that these guys are now trying to say, "Well, the Obama administration, because he dismantled the interrogation program, is somehow less humane than we were," is just a sick joke. I mean, the fact is that Obama continued many of the worst policies, on a counterterrorism level, that were built up under the Bush and Cheney administration. And these Republicans, they would love to be doing exactly what Obama is doing. They’re just attacking him because he’s Obama. But they love his so-called national security policy. At the end of the day, they’re being motivated more by their own partisan agenda. And it’s an attempt to argue—and it’s an insidious argument—that torture is actually a policy that the United States should fully embrace once again. That’s what they’re trying to do here. But they quietly love the Obama administration’s drone policy and counterterrorism policy.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, we are going to leave it there, and I want to thank you both for being with us. Rooj Alwazir, thank you for joining us, Yemeni-American activist, speaking to us from Washington, D.C. And Jeremy Scahill, producer and writer of the documentary film, Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield. He’s also the author of the new book by the same name. Jeremy is national security correspondent for The Nation and also a correspondent for Democracy Now! His film Dirty Wars is still in theaters around the country, also available on demand on your cable network. It is an IFC film.
Now for my 2 cents :
Wholly cow where do I begin. President Obama extending his long arm of injustice to punish a journalist in another country for exposing the US drone strikes that killed many innocent people. Then strong arms the Yemen government to take the credit and place the journalist in prison.
So just imagine what the us government would do to us with information they gather from NSA. If anyone says anything they government doesn't like they can come after you.

NOW its time to change your life;

If you ever wanted to make a difference in your life and those you love, but just have not found how. You must check this out. No pressure no BS just good business. I quit my 6 figure job in 2001 and doing this. I can tell you it works.

You will not be disappointed. Its is totally free just click add email and click to be amazed.


For those who see the free information we will send you one month free business advice. You will be surprised at how good this is and can cancel at any time. But you wont want to.